Skip to main content

Native or liquid staking?

Native staking keeps your SOL in a stake account only your wallet controls, pointed at a validator you pick. Liquid staking turns your SOL into a token, such as JitoSOL or mSOL, that you can trade or use in DeFi, while a pool picks the validators. Native has fewer moving parts. Liquid is faster to get out of.

What is the difference between native and liquid staking?

Native staking is staking straight from your own wallet. You create a stake account and point it at one validator, a server that runs the Solana network. Your stake adds to that validator's voting weight, and you get a share of the rewards it earns. Rewards arrive once per epoch, a network cycle of about 1–2 days.

The SOL never leaves your control. Solana's built-in stake program runs the stake account, and your wallet holds its withdraw authority: the key that decides where the SOL can go. The validator gets your voting weight. It never gets your coins.

Liquid staking puts a pool in the middle. You deposit SOL into the pool and receive a liquid staking token, or LST, in return. JitoSOL (from Jito) and mSOL (from Marinade) are two well-known examples. The pool spreads the deposited SOL across many validators and uses its own rules to decide which ones qualify. The token sits in your wallet. You can hold it, trade it or use it in DeFi apps.

Which one fits depends on what you want your SOL to do while it earns.

How do native and liquid staking compare?

Native stakingLiquid staking (e.g. JitoSOL, mSOL)
Who holds the SOLA stake account your wallet controlsThe pool. You hold a token for your share
Getting outUnstake, then withdraw: usually by the next epoch, sometimes longer when many stakers exit at onceSwap the token for SOL at any time. Trading or protocol fees may apply
Extra risk layerNone. Solana's built-in stake program runs the accountThe pool's smart contracts
Who picks the validatorYouThe pool, by its own rules. JitoSOL, for example, delegates only to validators that meet Jito's criteria
FeesThe validator's commission, plus a tiny network fee to signValidators' commissions, any pool fees, and trading fees when you swap out
Use in DeFiNo. Staked SOL sits in a stake account, not a tokenYes. The token can be traded or used in DeFi apps

Neither column wins every row. Native gives you control and one less layer to trust. Liquid gives you flexibility.

When does native staking make more sense?

  • You're holding for months or years. If you don't expect to need the SOL at short notice, waiting an epoch or so to get out rarely matters.
  • You want as few moving parts as possible. No pool, no token, no swap. Just your wallet, a stake account and a validator.
  • You want to choose who you back. Your stake adds weight to the validator you picked. You might pick a smaller one on purpose, to help spread stake across the network.
  • You want to see exactly what you pay. One validator, one set of commission rates, with its history on record.

One answer on Solana Stack Exchange put the trade in a single sentence: "native staking doesn't incur any additional fees, but you need to wait for an epoch rollover for any staking or unstaking to take place."

When does liquid staking make more sense?

  • You want your staked SOL to do something else too. A stake account can't be used in DeFi. A token can.
  • You might need to sell at short notice. Swapping a token for SOL is one transaction. You don't wait for the epoch to end.
  • You'd rather not pick a validator. The pool spreads your SOL across many of them, so one validator having a bad epoch has only a small effect on your share.
  • You're fine with one more layer to trust. The pool's smart contracts sit between you and the stake.

If most of these describe you, liquid staking is a reasonable choice. Our site is built around native staking, but that doesn't make native the right answer for everyone.

What are the risks of each?

Start with what they share. Solana has no slashing today: there's no on-chain penalty that takes stake away from delegators when a validator misbehaves. On both paths, a bad validator costs you rewards, not coins.

Native staking

  • Your validator goes offline. While it isn't voting, your stake earns nothing. The SOL stays put, and you can move it.
  • Your validator raises its commission. Sometimes that's an ordinary price change. Sometimes it's a commission rug pull: a spike timed for the moment rewards are counted.
  • You pick blind. A name and a rate in a wallet's list don't tell you whether that validator has a clean record.
  • Your own wallet security. Whoever controls your wallet controls the stake account. Keep your recovery phrase offline, and never type it into a website.

Liquid staking

  • Smart-contract risk. A bug or exploit in the pool's programs could affect deposits. This is the layer native staking doesn't have.
  • Exit costs. Swapping out can cost trading or protocol fees. If you swap often, they add up.
  • Someone else chooses. The pool's rules decide where your SOL goes, and a pool can change its rules.

Which one earns more?

Neither, reliably. Both earn from the same sources: inflation rewards (new SOL the network pays to stakers) and MEV tips (extra rewards from how transactions are ordered in a block). Validators take a commission on both. With a liquid token, pool fees may come out as well.

With native staking, your result depends on the one validator you chose: how reliably it votes and what it charges. With a liquid token, it depends on the pool's whole mix of validators and on the pool's fees.

Any yield you see, for either, is worked out from past epochs. It changes every epoch and it isn't a promise. If you compare, compare the last 30 days, not a single epoch or an advertised figure.

Can I use both?

Yes. Nothing stops you from keeping part of your SOL in a native stake account and part in a liquid token. One sensible split: native for the SOL you plan to hold long term, liquid for the part you may want to move quickly. You can also switch later, in either direction.

How do I choose a validator for native staking?

Liquid staking skips this step. With native staking it's the step that matters most, and the one where people get stuck.

Our validator list gives every validator a Score from 0 to 100 that puts reliability first. Reliability counts for 65 points: uptime, performance, track record, how its stake is funded and spread, and its software. Fees count for 35. A Score of 70 or more is rated Reliable. The formula is public on our methodology page.

Red flags sit next to each name, so you see problems before you see numbers:

  • Offline now: not voting, so its stakers earn nothing until it's back.
  • Blacklisted: on the Jito or Marinade blacklist.
  • Keeps 100%: takes all inflation rewards, so its delegators get none of them (the main part of staking income).
  • Fees raised: raised its commission recently, or spiked it and dropped it back.

If you want a short list, use the Good for beginners filter. It shows validators rated Reliable, with no red flags, fees of 7% or less, not among the largest validators, and with at least 30 epochs of history. Treat it as a good starting point, not a guarantee. A Score describes a track record so far.

After you stake, our Telegram alerts can tell you if your validator goes offline or changes its commission. All they need is your public key.

Questions

Not in general. Liquid staking spreads your SOL across many validators, which softens the hit if one goes offline. It also adds the pool's smart contracts as a layer you have to trust. Native staking has no such layer, but your rewards depend on the one validator you choose. Solana has no slashing today on either path.

Yes. The quick way is to swap the token for SOL, which can cost trading or protocol fees. Some pools also offer a way to return the token directly; check the pool's documentation for timing and feesNeeds verification. With native staking, you unstake, wait for the epoch to end, then withdraw.

Not by default. Both earn from the same sources: inflation rewards and MEV tips, minus validator commissions. A liquid token may also carry pool fees. Native rewards depend on the one validator you pick. Any rate you see for either is based on past epochs, changes every epoch and is not a promise.

No. Your SOL sits in a stake account that only your wallet controls. The validator gets your voting weight, not your coins. The most a validator can do is go offline, which pauses your rewards, or raise its commission. Native staking never asks for your recovery phrase, only for a signature in your wallet.

Yes. Turn the token back into SOL by swapping or redeeming it, and the SOL lands in your wallet. From there you stake it natively with a validator you choose. The new stake usually starts earning from the next epoch, about 1–2 days later.